|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
i never saw that again. ive seen satilites and space lab but not that. everything else ive seen moves in a straight line, it does not move like that did
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Didn't Spacelab crash in like the 70s or 80s?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What exactly is the deal with the ISS being very hard to see; why a helicopter had to be the "rational" option to explain lights in the nighttime sky? The ISS is visible and hard to mistake for anything else. The Russian Mir space station was discarded and burned down upon hitting the atmosphere. Everyone thought that the space station was dead and the debris that survived the plunge was buried on the ocean bed. But...! Strange things are going on in the rooms of Kremlin after midnight. Some believe that there is a rational explanation for the weird activity, but some don't buy it. Can things turn into ghosts? http://youtube.com/watch?v=xAGpW60s9Wk |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have watched sateelites and whatever else appears in the sky for many years, and there are not only an awful lot of them, but they can appear to move in peculiar ways - nor always straight lines. Diffraction by the atmosphere can cause them to move in what look like arcs, or to apparently 'swerve'. They can flash brightly (reflections of polishe anteena or solar panels) and of course vanish into the earth's shadow (usually going orange/ yellow as they do).
If you go out on any clear night, anywhere in the world, you'll probably see several every hour, the brightest being the ISS, which is usually fairly low in the sky around dawn and dusk, brighter than almost any star. There are sites that churn out predictions if you want to see them... though what the point is, I don't know? I once caught Skylab in my telesdope for a fraction of a second, and was thrilled to see its dolar panels like little wings... but that was thirty years ago, I need bigger thrills to keep me happy nowadays... |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
ok firstly. You're wrong, 'Spacelab' is not a slightly modified shuttle. Its was a module, taken up and constructed in a long series of normal shuttle flights waay back in the 80s and 90s. Secondly, unless you have a telescope, even something in a low orbit would be indistinguishable to the naked eye. Do you realise how high up that actually is? Doesn't seem like you do. It probably was an aircraft flying at an extreme altitude. Some military and special use aircraft have fixed lighting and don't use strobes in certain circumstances. Nothing man made in orbit would behave like that, certainly not a satellite, and absolutely nothing that you would be able to see. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|