[ManxRed]

Of course they landed on the moon, you student nutters!

[chargrill]

I'm not sure what to believe on the subject of the moon landing. a lot of the arguments for and against are made up so it's best to come to your own educated guess rather than listen to conspiricist nutballs on tv and the internet. many people mention the flag moving when it was placed, well it only flapped a few times as it was placed once it had been placed it remained still, now it would of flapped as it was placed because of the momentum of the placers moving arm. but there are many other convincing arguments from either side one conclusion me and my father came to was what if they did land on the moon but when they got back to earth found that most of their camera films and other equipment had been wiped by the radiation in space, what if the landing was real but the evidence was faked?

[abbondanzieri]

current results: yes 8 no 5 :roll:

conspiricist nutballs

a googlewhack? or great name for a band?

anyway, can't be long...Elvis is waiting in his UFO for me, we're off to do some crop circles - must remember to take my homeopathic travel sickness tablets

[jacquit]

Now i know that isn't true because at the exact time you wrote your post Elvis was on the top deck of a number 51 bus going to woolwich!!

[Lil]

I was 16 when the moon landing happened. My mother made me watch because it was history in the making. It just looked so fake to me that it was laughable. I've never really believed that it happened. It wasn't until much later that I found out that a lot of others didn't believe it either. Really, how much more fake could it have looked? It looked like something from a B movie. Why would the U.S. have faked it? Maybe they were tired of spending money on the space race and wanted to hurry up and prove their superiority to the Russians. I'm American, by the way.

[Pyschicpaul]

Is there not anyone from the spirit world who could answer this?

[keele]

Funny how These "Fake" stories only seemed to appear after the film "Capricorn One" came out....

As to all the "points" that prove fakery...well people just end up "refusing" to believe anything they don't want to believe...you may say: "this factor proves a point"...and they simply reply: "I don't believe it, it's a fake....", curious tho' how they never then follow that up by showing us HOW it was ALL "faked"........?

But then....This is not a new thing....Before Marco Polo no one believed China existed....some probably still don't !
They thought the Earth was flat....and if you sailed too close you "fell off" the edge of the world.....
Nice to see it's still going strong....


Curious then that Chain mail armour can also "flap" about....with no wind....just like that American flag....

If you took a picture in the desert at night....you won't see any stars in "our" sky either...
And shadows of rocks on Earth go in all odd directions....as they also do on the moon...
And IF Apollo 12 was a fake....then so was Surveyor in 1966, for they visited it and brought back it's camera....But then where does the "fakery" end...no Surveyor...No Gemini or Mercury....No X-15 Rocket Plane....?

Lastly if Apollo 11 never landed on the moon....how come an Observatory in New Mexico can "bounce" lazer's off the experiment STILL up there on the moon,and still working, in the Sea of Tranquillity where Armstrong & Aldrin "allegedly" left it....
- "it's a fake"...they all cry...BUT without any real "proof" of their blanket claim....but then by that logic surely EVERYTHING must be a "fake"...? - have any of the doubters been to that New Mexico Observatory and seen the Lazer experiments....?, then PROVED conclusively beyond any "Reasonable Doubt" that those Lazer Experiments are a "fake".....?

so I would say PROVE All those people around the world lied between 1969 and 1972.....prove all those "missions", blast-off's , "transmissions", and splash downs in the ocean were faked...prove the Apollo 13 near disaster was a fake....?

It is interesting if you turn the argument around on to the "fake" screamers....tell us how ALL those people, in all those countries were included in the "conspiricy" and ALL have then kept quiet ever since.......including Jodrell Bank, Autstralian tracking stations, etc....

As for those "fake" poor quality pictures....actually remember those cameras were very poor by our standards now...but again prove to us HOW those photos were faked....?

One curious other point....look how every one of those men who walked on the moon later changed...becoming recluses, preachers, etc....the "alleged" experiences seemed to transform them all....
So only when the doubters have "proved" all these points can we begin to consider the validity of the "fake landings" idea....


Remember too, that Many believed Columbus never discovered any land at the end of his voyage....that disbelief continued for many years too....so logically America does not exist....does it....?.

[bradufo]

thay may have not gone to the moon, but wat about the ufos seen and the ufo on the moon pic

[Shannygragger]

also there is no shadows cast on the moon but again in the photos there are shadows behind the astronaut :)

Hello - first post.

This sort of inaccurate and grossly misinformed statement is what adds fuel to the fire of conspiracy theories.

There are shadows on the moon - the sun shines onto it...which is why it (the moon) then shines onto us.

[Shannygragger]

Originally Posted by bradufo

thay may have not gone to the moon, but wat about the ufos seen and the ufo on the moon pic

Strange how these things, given their huge importance, are only ever known to a few people "in the underground movement" or by some bloke down the pub called "Baz" and his mates.

If I had conclusive photos of a UFO on the moon, I'd be shouting and screaming about it from the top of East Chepstow Asda Walmart.